Become our fan on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Tell others you like us on StumbleUpon!

EPA Taking Tough Stand on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up

PDF Print E-mail
There was an interesting article in The Washington Post over the holiday break that looked into the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s “get tough” approach to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Here’s a portion of the article.
 
In the fall, the federal government outlined what it expects of the jurisdictions in the Chesapeake watershed, which are Maryland, Virginia, the District, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware and New York. A computer model of the bay will be used to calculate a pollution "diet" for the Chesapeake -- and each state will have to reduce its pollution accordingly.
 
Tuesday's letter explained what might happen if they don't. EPA officials said they might:

-- Object to state-issued permits for new sources of pollution, such as factories, sewage-treatment plants or suburban storm sewers.

-- Require states to offset pollution in one area by cutting it in another. If a state can't find ways to curb pollution from farms, for instance, the EPA could require stricter cuts from sewage-treatment plants.

-- Take tighter control of federal money that goes to states for antipollution programs, to make sure it is used to solve outstanding problems.

In Virginia, Natural Resources Secretary L. Preston Bryant Jr. said he thought that the EPA's threats might actually change the trajectory of the Chesapeake cleanup, by forcing states to take their obligations more seriously.

"This letter, and whatever follows up from this, is going to get people's attention," said Bryant, part of the outgoing administration of Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D).

But the Chesapeake Bay Foundation said the EPA's threats were not tough enough. William C. Baker, the foundation's president, said the EPA wants to wait for states to set new goals for cleaning up pollution late next year -- when it should instead hold the states to goals they've already set.

Oliver A. Houck, a Tulane University professor who studies water laws, said the EPA's threats don't solve a legal loophole that has bedeviled the Chesapeake cleanup since its beginning.

Clean-water laws make it easy to crack down on pollution that comes out of a pipe, such as treated sewage and factory discharges. But they give states less power to crack down on pollution that doesn't come from pipes, such as the fertilizer and animal manure that wash off suburban lawns and farm fields.
 
We’ve been paying close attention to efforts to clean up the Chesapeake Bay and as we planned our energy project we took note of Chesapeake Bay activists who have stated that one thing we can do to clean up the Chesapeake Bay is to reduce the amount of nitrates and phosphates discharged into the Bay from sewage treatment plants. This 2003 study released by the Chesapeake Bay foundation cites “wastewater discharged from sewage treatment plants is the second largest source of nitrogen pollution to the Chesapeake Bay.”
 
Our proposed combined cycle natural gas and solar energy facility could use treated wastewater that would be purchased from the Town of Leesburg. The effluent, which is currently piped into the Potomac River, would be used to create steam and for cooling and would remove 5 million  gallons per day of Potomac. 


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! Slashdot! StumbleUpon! Yahoo!
 

Loudoun Power on Twitter

An error occurred

Oops, an error seems to have occurred. We're sorry for any inconvenience this might have caused. If the error persists, feel free to tell us about it.

Wastewater Would Be Used for Steam

The facility is proposed for 80 acres just south of Leesburg, on property with two existing natural gas lines and two existing electric transmission lines. For steam cooling, the plant would use up to 5 million gallons a day of treated wastewater it would purchase from Leesburg. The treated water is now discharged into the Potomac River.

Read More

Get The Latest

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Wastewater Would Be Used for Steam

Wastewater Would Be Used for SteamThe facility is proposed for 80 acres just south of Leesburg, on property with two existing natural gas lines and two existing electric transmission lines. For steam cooling, the plant would use up to 5 million gallons a day of treated wastewater it would purchase from Leesburg. The treated water is now discharged into the Potomac River.

Read More

The Fiscal Impact

The Fiscal ImpactGreen Energy Partners’ proposal to construct a 981 megawatt energy facility will be a boon to county coffers. It is estimated that this facility will generate approximately $12 million in annual local tax revenue. There won’t be any taxpayer-funded infrastructure needs.

Read more